Free Essays on Japan Subdued

The original version was titled Japan Subdued and was published in 1961. After receiving important information, Herbert Feis revised his book in 1966 and titling it, The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War II. His goal was to inform his readers about every aspect of the war. He briefly summed up everything into 200 pages. Also, revealing first hand information from the White House and the Pentagon. That is what separates his first edition from his second. His purpose was to show his audience the events leading to the end of the war and diplomatic arrangements in the east Asia. June 7, 1893, Louis and Louise Feis gave birth to Herbert Feis in New York, NY. He achieved his A.B. in 1916 and Ph.D. in 1921 from Harvard University. During World War I Herbert Feis served in the U.S. Naval Reserve and became lieutenant junior grade. He authors books ranging from economic affairs, forgein policy and aid, as well as humanitarian issues. His job experience could be as long as this paragraph. He was an adviser on the international economic affairs, department of state and consultant for various corporations. In 1964, became consultant for what is now a media giant, National Broadcasting Co. Finally, was head of the economics department at the university of cincinnati from 1926-1929. Became a visiting professor at Harvard and Columbia universities in his later years. He won the Pulitzer prize in history for Between War and Peace in 1960. Also, was inducted into Princetonà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s Institute for Advanced Study in 1960. Personally, I would not thin k a man with the intellect such as his, could be bias towards anything. He was open-minded and very concerned about the economy. The economy was the only thing he was bias for. In his resume, it seemed he favored economical affairs rather than political affairs. Mr. Feis was well qualified to write this book. The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War II was a revised 5 years l... Free Essays on Japan Subdued Free Essays on Japan Subdued The original version was titled Japan Subdued and was published in 1961. After receiving important information, Herbert Feis revised his book in 1966 and titling it, The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War II. His goal was to inform his readers about every aspect of the war. He briefly summed up everything into 200 pages. Also, revealing first hand information from the White House and the Pentagon. That is what separates his first edition from his second. His purpose was to show his audience the events leading to the end of the war and diplomatic arrangements in the east Asia. June 7, 1893, Louis and Louise Feis gave birth to Herbert Feis in New York, NY. He achieved his A.B. in 1916 and Ph.D. in 1921 from Harvard University. During World War I Herbert Feis served in the U.S. Naval Reserve and became lieutenant junior grade. He authors books ranging from economic affairs, forgein policy and aid, as well as humanitarian issues. His job experience could be as long as this paragraph. He was an adviser on the international economic affairs, department of state and consultant for various corporations. In 1964, became consultant for what is now a media giant, National Broadcasting Co. Finally, was head of the economics department at the university of cincinnati from 1926-1929. Became a visiting professor at Harvard and Columbia universities in his later years. He won the Pulitzer prize in history for Between War and Peace in 1960. Also, was inducted into Princetonà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s Institute for Advanced Study in 1960. Personally, I would not thin k a man with the intellect such as his, could be bias towards anything. He was open-minded and very concerned about the economy. The economy was the only thing he was bias for. In his resume, it seemed he favored economical affairs rather than political affairs. Mr. Feis was well qualified to write this book. The Atomic Bomb and the End of World War II was a revised 5 years l...

Strong Acid Definition and Examples

Strong Acid Definition and Examples A strong acid is an acid that is completely dissociated or ionized in an aqueous solution. It is a chemical species with a high capacity to lose a proton, H. In water, a strong acid loses one proton, which is captured by water to form the hydronium ion: HA(aq) H2O → H3O(aq) A−(aq) Diprotic and polyprotic acids may lose more than one proton, but the strong acid pKa value and reaction only refers to the loss of the first proton. Strong acids have a small logarithmic constant (pKa) and a large acid dissociation constant (Ka). Most strong acids are corrosive, but some of the superacids are not corrosive. In contrast, some of the weak acids (e.g., hydrofluoric acid) may be highly corrosive. Note: As acid concentration increases, the ability to dissociate diminishes. Under normal conditions in water, strong acids dissociate completely, but extremely concentrated solutions do not. Examples of Strong Acids While there are many weak acids, there are few strong acids. The common strong acids include: HCl (hydrochloric acid)H2SO4 (sulfuric acid)HNO3 (nitric acid)HBr (hydrobromic acid)HClO4 (perchloric acid)HI (hydroiodic acid)p-toluenesulfonic acid (an organic soluble strong acid)methanesulfonic acid (a liquid organic strong acid) The following acids dissociate almost completely in water, so they are often considered to be strong acids, although they are not more acidic than the hydronium ion, H3O. HNO3Â  (nitric acid)HClO3Â  (chloric acid) Some chemists consider the hydronium ion, bromic acid, periodic acid, perbromic acid, and periodic acid to be strong acids. If the ability to donate protons is used as the primary criterion for acid strength, then the strong acids (from strongest to weakest) would be: H[SbF6]Â  (fluoroantimonic acid)FSO3HSbF5Â  (magic acid)H(CHB11Cl11)Â  (carborane superacid)FSO3HÂ  (fluorosulfuric acid)CF3SO3HÂ  (triflic acid) These are the superacids, which are defined as acids that are more acidic than 100% sulfuric acid. The superacids permanently protonate water. Factors That Determine Acid Strength You may be wondering why the strong acids dissociate so well, or why certain weak acids do not completely ionize. A few factors come into play: atomic radius - As the atomic radius increases, so does acidity. For example, HI is a stronger acid than HCl (iodine is a larger atom than chlorine).electronegativity - The more electronegative a conjugate base in the same period of the periodic table is (A-), the more acidic it is.electrical charge - The more positive the charge on an atom, the higher its acidity. In other words, its easier to take a proton from a neutral species than from one with a negative charge.equilibrium - When an acid dissociates, equilibrium is reached with its conjugate base. In the case of strong acids, the equilibrium strongly favors the product or is to the right of a chemical equation. The conjugate base of a strong acid is much weaker than water as a base.solvent - In most applications, strong acids are discussed in relation to water as a solvent. However, acidity and basicity have meaning in nonaqueous solvent. For example, in liquid ammonia, acetic acid ionizes completely and may be considered a str ong acid, even though it is a weak acid in water.

Data Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

Data Analysis - Essay Example ysing the factors which influenced mind during voting, particularly how their educational qualifications, religious leanings, gender income, etc., influenced their voting behaviour. Various political and social developments impacted the voting behaviour of the people in the British elections. As stated by Alvarez and Nagler (1997), in the United Kingdom, â€Å"the sustained revival of the Liberal Party since 1970, the rise of nationalist parties in Wales and Scotland, and the new Social Democratic Party, poised significant challenges to the established two-party system.† Apart from these aspects, studies were conducted to find out certain personal and social factors also impacted the voting behaviour. One of the key aspects which is thought to influence the voting pattern of the voters is their education and thereby intelligence levels. Deary, Batty and Gale (2008) in the 1970 British Cohort Study, examined the relation between childhood intelligence and how those people voted at the ages of 30 and above during the 2001 UK general election. The studies found that, â€Å"People with higher childhood intelligence were more likely to vote in the 2001 election (38% increased prevalence per SD increase in intelligence), People with higher childhood intelligence were more likely to take part in rallies and demonstrations, and to sign petitions, and expressed a greater interest in politics (40%, 65%, 33%, and 58% increased prevalence per SD increase in intelligence, respectively).† (Deary, Batty and Gale 2008). The other aspect, which could also inf luence the voters during the voting process, is their religious leanings. Kotler-Berkowitz (2001) points out how data from the 1991 and 1992 waves of the British Household Panel Study, when statistically analyzed (using multinomial logistic regression analysis) state that religions influence the voting decisions of sizable number of British citizens. â€Å"Religious belonging, behaviour and belief, as well as the religious context